~

If Love is defined as a physical phenom,

what’s then its number, we wonder, in physics?

~

An electrical loss from a long lost electron?

Is it mapped to the genes in genetics?

~

After guessing and going over the question,

did we notice     how much love’s kinetic?

~

Oh Man! You map-maker, go make for Yourself

a perfection of love without all its woes.

Then please explain to each, the wealth

of the love that is found when it snows!

~

There are some things  science just cannot know.

~

When science can’t give us all of the answers,

Psychology may know where it’s at.

Empirical data depends on the sensors,

a soft science doesn’t deal with all that.

~

If Love be then from the mental gym,

where attraction reaction’s by types

of people all packaged and in their thin skin,

it still will not tell why Love bites.

~

It would seem, that indeed, love is abstract.

perhaps it’s because it’s universal,

not tied to a physics, but still a fact,

part and parcel, yet still metaphysical.

~

Say a metaphysical should fall in a forrest,

within the margins of error, of course,

when it does hit the ground, it’s down, but not out;

a universal’s reversal     still has such doubt.

~

It may never be known     what a love’s all about.

.

.

.

.

(revised 16 December 2011)

Copyright © 2011 Marvin Loyd Welborn. All Rights Reserved.